People participate in journal clubs or book clubs. Geek Club is my affectionate term for documenting summaries of all the geeky stuff I read. I work as a physiatrist at the East Orange VA hospital in NJ. This may also serve as a resource for the residents who rotate through there.

Thursday, November 19, 2020

Phorest & Trees 11/2020

 

Phorest & Trees

Sharing the things I’m reading but not eating

 

COVID infection: Not recommended based on recent anecdotal evidence

I meant to send this email out 2 weeks ago (around thanksgiving) but me and my family were afflicted with COVID-19. We are all fine now. Thank you for the many people who reached out with kind wishes.

 

Brachial Neuritis in the news

Thanks to Dr. Bitterman for the link. I would recommend minimally knowing what is in this article because it is being read by your patients.

 

The Biphasic SNAP

For those of you I have taught some volume conduction theory concepts, I typically admit defeat about the biphasic SNAP. Theoretically it should be triphasic with an initial positive deflection. So I asked Dr. Dumitru to explain it and I finally do. This is not for the faint of heart. Actually it’s really not for anyone except true geeks. So I recommend you not click on this.

 

Fraud and Abuse

  • Are you at risk for penalty by the OIG for the talks you’re giving?
  • AANEM advocated for Bipartisan H.R. 8780 which addresses quality in EDx medicine. The bill addresses “ongoing problems with EDX fraud and abuse, as well as poor quality EDX testing, by unqualified providers, many of whom are using substandard EDX equipment.” It was modeled after the approach taken by mammography and sleep labs who faced similar battles. See the attachment for details. Click here for AANEM advocacy.

 

More about Coding 2021

  • There was some confusion about the modifiers 25 and 26. I asked the coding expert at AANEM and this is what she shared (along with a great attachment explaining why insurance companies should pay us for same day EMG and E&M) Modifier 26 is typically used in a hospital setting. Each code is made up of three components:  a professional component (physician work), a technical component (supplies, equipment, etc.) and liability. For physicians who work in a hospital system, the hospital needs to bill for the technical portion of the code and the physician bills for the physician work part of the code.  Modifier 26 is what the physician would use to do this and the TC modifier is what the hospital would use.        Modifier 25 is used to establish that there was an identifiably separate E/M performed on the same day as a procedure. This is done because inherent within each procedure code is time to perform a basic evaluation and management. There are many instances where it is appropriate to bill for an E/M on the same day, but modifier 25 needs to be used with the appropriate E/M code in those instances.  I have attached AANEM’s position statement Billing for Same Day Evaluation and Management and Electrodiagnostic Testing which details some common scenarios where it is OK to bill for an E/M on the same day as an EDX procedure.

·         One of our graduates at a large non-VA institution who frequently lectures on coding had this to offer (which I agree with): My very simplified impression of the new coding rules is that the MDM rules are basically the same, the level of service was always really determined by MDM, now they more explicitly state the HPI and bullet points in the PE don’t matter (thank goodness).   If you do a procedure same day as the visit it gets a -25 modifier. If you are doing a test (EMG) then you can't double dip by reviewing it in an E+M visit the same day. AANEM has very strict criteria as to what denotes medical necessity for doing an E+M visit on top of the EDx visit. I rarely bill a f/u visit if i am doing EDx (or a new patient for that matter) , and if i did the medical decision making is not explaining the EDx (that gets reimbursed with the EDx codes) its ordering medication, discussing other problems, ordering PT and having a discussion about planning and other treatment options not related to the usual counselling expected from an EDx visit.  Don't be fooled by the new rules...if we don't continue to have robust H+P we will see denials go up for advanced imaging and procedures.  (Which i am already seeing and others have mentioned too). I don't expect my average LOS to change a whole lot, hopefully documentation will be quicker. My new plan is to shrink my notes significantly..especially since patients will be able to read them more easily. I fear every word I write will be scrutinized by certain patients and it's just not worth the time. I will template more things to ensure studies and procedures get covered.

 

Revenge of PMR Poster Boy

This is the universe getting back at me for the last one. Ugh. I should have sent a newer picture.

 

Trees

  • To my brain injury folks. Using music to awaken the mind. If you watch, please do so to the end.
  • Next time you’re on Netflix, look up Crip Camp: A Disability Revolution.
  • Why we don’t use sterile water with our botox?...cuz it hoitz!
  • When you’re at the VA, check out the Atlas of orthoses and Assistive devices. (Link likely won’t work outside the VA.) thanks dr. edmond. Also of interest is the Atlas of common pain syndromes (Attendings may like the Atlas of Uncommon Pain Syndromes)
  • A patient of mine wanted a referral for “TMR” to address pain; I am quite familiar with its use in prosthetic control but not pain. If anyone has experience with this, please contact me. TMR consists of a nerve transfer of residual peripheral nerves to otherwise redundant target muscle motor nerves. When TMR is performed on an amputee, the residual peripheral nerve is mobilized and any neuroma is excised. The native motor nerve of the target muscle is then located through nerve stimulators and transected near the muscle. Lastly, the residual peripheral nerve is coapted to the motor nerve, close to its point of entry into the muscle.
  • New knowledge of specific chemo induced CNS neurotoxicity: CD19-directed immunotherapies are clinically effective for treating B cell malignancies but also cause a high incidence of neurotoxicity. The result is that a subset of patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells or bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) antibodies display severe neurotoxicity, including fatal cerebral edema associated with T cell infiltration into the brain.
  • Swimming benefits autonomic responses.

 

No comments: